Thursday, July 14, 2011

Read Twice and Call Me in the Morning

So it happened. No big deal. It happens to everyone. I mean, sure, it was Essendon but it’s nothing to be ashamed of. It’s a perfectly normal occurrence that all teams go through. Don’t worry about it. We’ll just hug tonight.

Wait, it happened again? Against West Coast.?!? Uh-oh. Time for the Viagra…

Ok, so maybe the analogy doesn’t quite work, but with the shocking similarities in the two losses, it might be time to see whether Geelong has a legitimate dysfunction or if it’s just a case of, “I don’t know what happened… it’s never happened before.”

Let’s take a look at the Cats symptoms and some possible treatments:

Symptom: Slow starts
It was clear in the Essendon game that the Bombers were fired up and treating the game as their Grand Final – and this might be half the problem. Every week Geelong’s opponents are looking to put themselves on the map by taking a big scalp and thus come out super switched on early against the Cats. As the last two weeks has shown us, it often take until the halftime break for the players to mentally switch back on.

Treatment: Besides the mental aspects, Geelong should line-up with their “early-starters” centre square package for the first quarter; guys that hit the field breathing fire, i.e. Paul Chapman. Which should also help the following:

Symptom: No clearances/First possession
This was painfully clear against Essendon as the Cats compiled their lowest possession count since 2006 and also early versus West Coast as Geelong were smashed in the middle.

Treatment: More aggression at the contest and the best clearances players in at the middle. Paging Joel Selwood…

Symptom: Missing targets/Poor disposal
The last few weeks have been so reminiscent of Geelong’s kicking skills circa-2004 that I’m pretty sure I saw Ben Graham at Subi last week fielding half-trackers.

Treatment: Is this a sign of fatigue? Has the dreaded “training load” picked up as we’ve crossed the mid-season point? If so, then a week on the Gold Coast should help.

Symptom: Poor forward line function
Against both Essendon and West Coast Geelong had more inside 50s than their opposition but were unable to convert those chances on the scoreboard. The Cats seemed to lack system and, with P.O.D. not firing, another viable forward target.

Treatment: Geelong need two tall forwards, it’s as simple as that. Vardy has shown promise but has had a quiet two weeks, Mooney is being stashed away for a late run and Hawkins gets his second chance this week. Either way, this needs to be settled before finals.

Symptom: Forward press not working/leaking goals over the back
This is probably a criticism of the forward press in general, as once the zone is broken there is space behind and easy goals to be had.

Treatment: Is there room for a 17-man press? Could you leave a player in the goal square, as goalkeeper defensively and as an easy forward out the other way? How about playing man-on-man for a quarter then zone/press for a quarter? Or changing after a goal is kicked? Wouldn’t this confuse the opposition and possibly give your players a rest?

Symptom: Perhaps the Cats simply aren’t good enough this year
This is what we’ve been hearing from the media for over six months, maybe they’re right?

Treatment: Geelong’s best quarter of football all year was the first quarter of round eight, against Collingwood. If that’s not enough to give you hope, well, I can’t prescribe anything else.

15 Comments:

Anonymous Perthcats said...

True, true and more truth. Do you guys bulk bill?

1:26 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Captain, re "Geelong’s kicking skills circa-2004." I can handle the thought seeing the apparition that was Ben Graham fielding half-trackers at Subi last week, but am pleased you didn't see the ghost of the Kent of Kingsley in our forward line.
It would take substantially more than a pharmaceutical to erase that from my memory!

- Basso Divor

1:29 pm  
Anonymous attila said...

Pod's bag of eight is the first 8 goal haul since Kent's domination of North in 2006. Having opened with 8 goals for the season, how many do you think he kicked in total for the season?

Yep, 10. Aaah, Kent.

2:31 pm  
Anonymous attila said...

Oh, and what are people's thoughts on the game? For mine:

Christensen - gun. He keeps his spot when Shan "I have photos, coach" Shan inexplicably gets back in. Varcoe loses his. Ineffective and soft. If its your turn to go, you go. Pulling out of that contest was appalling.

West - not terrible, but not great. Still think Dawson is ahead of him. Though maybe he stays in to give Vardy a spell.

Hatchet - Weak defensively and still can't kick for shit. Took some nice contested marks though. More please Tommy.

Hogan's performance was depress.. err, disappointing. I don't see him as a regular firsts player.

3:44 pm  
Anonymous fustercluck said...

attila, I agree with your opinion of Christensen, the afro dude with the Swedish surname is going to be great, he is like a Stokesy that has a crack at the hardball. I'm rapt for the Pod and his bag of 8, but seriously, I could kick 5 on Matt McGuire in 2011.
Worst offering yet from Selwood, but he has a lot of credits in the bank, and was probably just rusty.
What is up with Chapman? He has has minimal sustained impact for the last 6 weeks.
Shan Shan is toast, Silkworm is gone, or going to Falafel town.

I don't know what I find more amusing, Kent Kinsley doing an impersonation of a key forward circa 2006 or Heath Shaw doing an impersonation of Hansie Cronje circa 2000.

for what it's worth: Go Cats

...fustercluck...

10:56 pm  
Anonymous fustercluck said...

AGHHHHHH! I spoke too soon, fuck it.

Shan Shan is back!

...fustercluck...

1:52 am  
Anonymous attila said...

I tried to warn you Fuster...

Shan Shan wasn't actually that terrible prior to being subbed off, but playing well against Bitchmond is a very poor indicator of how good someone actually is.

Bundy will surely get the rising star nomination this week - giving us three for the year. Not bad for a team of supposed washed up old hacks.

12:06 pm  
Anonymous fustercluck said...

An asshatting with a coach sacking attached? Now that's my kind of footy!

Go Cats

7:58 pm  
Anonymous attila said...

Geez, it looks like we broke them.

I just hope that Ling didn't catch the flu from Moloney, and that no one caught shitness from the rest of the Melbourne team.

This goal sums it up though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2ok5DRlp9A&feature=player_embedded

Bartel and Enright taking the piss in the back 50, followed by Wojo arrogantly strolling away from Mrs Watts, Varcoe playing like a millionaire, then Stevie J deciding that a straight kick is too easy and instead doing a 'nana off the side of the boot. Gold.

10:51 am  
Anonymous attila said...

With Gary pulling a heartstring, the line for the Cats v Suns game is now -90.5 points - holy shit.

12:04 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

While we're waiting for The Captain to return from "general soreness", can any BLLL reader enlighten me as to which Cat is nicknamed "Poodle"?
It's been bugging me.
Cheers,
Basso Divor

9:10 am  
Anonymous attila said...

Basso - it's Taylor Hunt.

Sadly, despite his name, he isn't actually the result of a genetic experiment combining Harry Taylor and Josh Hunt to create the ultimate backman.

Then again, if we did try such an experiment, we would risk just ending up with a player with Harry's teeth and Josh's courage....

9:48 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks Attila.
That sounds gnarly without even factoring in the Harry Taylor Syndrome! Reminds me of a previous blog - something about transplanting Selwo’s balls to Muscles Mackie!
Hey, this might be a good sub topic for one of the Captain’s future blogs. Which quality/characteristic/ability etc would you take from different players (past and present) to build the perfect footballing beast?
- Basso Divor

5:06 pm  
Anonymous attila said...

From our recent players, I would make the following beast, just for the lulz:

Ling's looks, Hunt's courage, Ablett's loyalty, Mooney's self control, Selwood's eloquence, Scarlett's gregariousness, Kent's accuracy, Mackie's bulk, Shan Shan's everything, Blake's second efforts, Brown's durability and Chapman's hair.

5:20 pm  
Anonymous fustercluck said...

How about we combine: Nablett's commitment, Ben Graham's body count, Riccardi's right foot, Mrs Watson's 2011 input, Stevie J's predictability, Rioli's hardness at the contest, Richmond's 5 year plan, Gubby Allan's humility, Collingwood's back-to-back chances, David Schwarz's blackjack prowess and Nick Dal Santo's manhood.

Now there's a fucked up Frankenstein.

...fustercluck...

9:10 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home