Keeping Your Nose Clean (How Not to)
This summer I’ve attempted more blogs than Andrew Lovett has sex crimes (allegedly), and every time I have either gotten stuck, or realised that, “Hey, that’s just not that interesting or funny or insightful or even legible.” (I was going through some old notebooks recently and found three full pages of drunken ramblings that look like someone was trying to get the ink flowing again in a pen.) Not even Shane “Shame” Watson morphing into Jacque Kallis was enough to rouse me from my slumber. But on a scale of 1-to-10, of “things I should probably write a blog about”, Matthew Stokes trafficking cocaine comes in at about a 48. (By the way, apologies for the title that sounds like a Radiohead song.)
Here’s a rundown of my rambling thought process immediately after Mrs Watson emailed me the news on Wednesday:
The police don’t usually charge someone unless they know they can get a conviction… I wonder if any other players are involved… How much coke was he actually doing? Are we talking a NYE bump or two, or Lindsay Lohan circa 2008...? Frank Costa will sack Stokes… Sack is a funny word… I wonder how the club will handle this… Will Demetriou get involved…? Will Stokes play the addiction card? Will someone else play the race card…? The girl who played Velma in the Scooby-Doo movie had a nice rack… How much salary cap space will it save us if he’s in prison…? The Geelong Advertiser is going to cover this like it’s the Cuban missile crisis… The Mentalist is getting more ridiculous every week… How should Geelong supporters feel about this? How do I feel about this? Shit, what do I write about this?!
(By the way, where does “having a Cuban drug-dealer moustache on the day you’re arrested on drug charges” rank in terms of inappropriate coincidences; below or above wearing a Gary Glitter t-shirt to a grade 6 calisthenics show? Seriously, he looks like he’s auditioning for ‘Underbelly 4: Lamby’s Revenge’.)
As usual, I needed the steady hand of Mrs Watson to guide me through the sea of questions, self-doubt and C-grade movies. Here’s his take:
“The fact that this useless prick keeps getting referred to as a "Premiership Forward" is the most annoying thing about this story. Sack him, let's move on.”
And that’s probably all there needs to be to it. (Ah Mrs Watson, if only the rest of the world possessed your cold pragmatism.)
However, in this current environment, we all know the modern media are ready to jump on this and fuck it to death like an untrained Labrador. Hell, they’re already halfway up your leg. And when this happens, a relatively small criminal matter becomes a national litmus test for anybody with any kind of public voice.
So before Barnaby Joyce or Tony Abbot or anyone at all with any kind of tenuous link to the Catholic Church starts telling us all about all our problems, allow me to get in first. (Speaking of which, do we know what Dawn Fraser thinks of all this? Really, she hasn’t said anything? Are we sure she’s still alive?)
Taking the initial police reports (and Stokes’ story) at face value, trafficking seems like an overblown charge for such a small amount of cocaine (especially on-sold at cost price. But, whatever). Nonetheless, Stokes, it would appear, is guilty of something. Is he more naive 25-year old than connected drug groupie? Probably. Being somewhat in the media spotlight, should he have known better? Yes. Is the charge a little trumped up because he has a profile? Of course it is.
This is not a sign of a “drug problem” in AFL clubs. It’s not an AFL player thinking he’s above the law. It’s not about rehabilitation, education and/or the eternally vague, “support”. It’s about a guy, who once played forward pocket quite well, who bought some drugs. So let’s treat it and punish for what it is, not what talking heads with obvious agendas may twist and fit it to be.
Lots of people buy drugs and use drugs and get caught by police with drugs and lose their jobs because of drugs. Now Stokes is probably going to lose his.
Let’s not lose our heads (or any sleep) over it.
And besides, look at bright side; how’s the form of Shane Watson!
This summer I’ve attempted more blogs than Andrew Lovett has sex crimes (allegedly), and every time I have either gotten stuck, or realised that, “Hey, that’s just not that interesting or funny or insightful or even legible.” (I was going through some old notebooks recently and found three full pages of drunken ramblings that look like someone was trying to get the ink flowing again in a pen.) Not even Shane “Shame” Watson morphing into Jacque Kallis was enough to rouse me from my slumber. But on a scale of 1-to-10, of “things I should probably write a blog about”, Matthew Stokes trafficking cocaine comes in at about a 48. (By the way, apologies for the title that sounds like a Radiohead song.)Here’s a rundown of my rambling thought process immediately after Mrs Watson emailed me the news on Wednesday:
The police don’t usually charge someone unless they know they can get a conviction… I wonder if any other players are involved… How much coke was he actually doing? Are we talking a NYE bump or two, or Lindsay Lohan circa 2008...? Frank Costa will sack Stokes… Sack is a funny word… I wonder how the club will handle this… Will Demetriou get involved…? Will Stokes play the addiction card? Will someone else play the race card…? The girl who played Velma in the Scooby-Doo movie had a nice rack… How much salary cap space will it save us if he’s in prison…? The Geelong Advertiser is going to cover this like it’s the Cuban missile crisis… The Mentalist is getting more ridiculous every week… How should Geelong supporters feel about this? How do I feel about this? Shit, what do I write about this?!
(By the way, where does “having a Cuban drug-dealer moustache on the day you’re arrested on drug charges” rank in terms of inappropriate coincidences; below or above wearing a Gary Glitter t-shirt to a grade 6 calisthenics show? Seriously, he looks like he’s auditioning for ‘Underbelly 4: Lamby’s Revenge’.)
As usual, I needed the steady hand of Mrs Watson to guide me through the sea of questions, self-doubt and C-grade movies. Here’s his take:
“The fact that this useless prick keeps getting referred to as a "Premiership Forward" is the most annoying thing about this story. Sack him, let's move on.”
And that’s probably all there needs to be to it. (Ah Mrs Watson, if only the rest of the world possessed your cold pragmatism.)
However, in this current environment, we all know the modern media are ready to jump on this and fuck it to death like an untrained Labrador. Hell, they’re already halfway up your leg. And when this happens, a relatively small criminal matter becomes a national litmus test for anybody with any kind of public voice.
So before Barnaby Joyce or Tony Abbot or anyone at all with any kind of tenuous link to the Catholic Church starts telling us all about all our problems, allow me to get in first. (Speaking of which, do we know what Dawn Fraser thinks of all this? Really, she hasn’t said anything? Are we sure she’s still alive?)
Taking the initial police reports (and Stokes’ story) at face value, trafficking seems like an overblown charge for such a small amount of cocaine (especially on-sold at cost price. But, whatever). Nonetheless, Stokes, it would appear, is guilty of something. Is he more naive 25-year old than connected drug groupie? Probably. Being somewhat in the media spotlight, should he have known better? Yes. Is the charge a little trumped up because he has a profile? Of course it is.
This is not a sign of a “drug problem” in AFL clubs. It’s not an AFL player thinking he’s above the law. It’s not about rehabilitation, education and/or the eternally vague, “support”. It’s about a guy, who once played forward pocket quite well, who bought some drugs. So let’s treat it and punish for what it is, not what talking heads with obvious agendas may twist and fit it to be.
Lots of people buy drugs and use drugs and get caught by police with drugs and lose their jobs because of drugs. Now Stokes is probably going to lose his.
Let’s not lose our heads (or any sleep) over it.
And besides, look at bright side; how’s the form of Shane Watson!

