El Caballa Rojo
Friday night, as Geelong battled Collingwood to within a 50m penalty of victory, I was in a basement, listening to a band that hadn’t played together for 11 years. The score updates I was graciously receiving from a friend, picked up in frequency and intensity during the frantic final quarter: “A goal in it. It’s living in our fifty.” But no matter the depth of my belief, and the enthusiasm of my replies, The Cats came up short.
Friday night, as Geelong battled Collingwood to within a 50m penalty of victory, I was in a basement, listening to a band that hadn’t played together for 11 years. The score updates I was graciously receiving from a friend, picked up in frequency and intensity during the frantic final quarter: “A goal in it. It’s living in our fifty.” But no matter the depth of my belief, and the enthusiasm of my replies, The Cats came up short.
As
music that was first released in 1999 was amazingly recreated in 2012, I was
reminded that everything has a context. And that often that context isn’t
revealed until after the fact.
No one knows
what the hard games are until they play them. Adelaide wasn’t expected to be
this good. Melbourne wasn’t expected to be this bad. The draw may look daunting
for The Cats going forward but good teams only become good retroactively, that
is, by beating other teams.
There are
currently three free hits in the AFL; Gold Coast, GWS and Melbourne. And last
year’s bad teams get a couple of extra licks of that ice-cream. Meanwhile, the
good teams are taking points off each other more often, resulting in a logjam
of seemingly average teams.
Geelong is
currently 10th on the ladder, but only one win and percentage off being 6th.
Losing to a quality opponent, in round 8, by essentially a kick, is not so bad. As long as they can also beat a few quality opponents, that is.
Now
on to the questions…
(All thanks for all the offerings. If I missed yours, and if y'all want to, we'll do it again later in the year. Much appreciated.)
Regarding
the future role of Taylor Hunt, potential Ling 2.0, Enright 2.0 or Wojo 2.0?
- fustercluck
He
started in a Wojo-type role, I don’t think he has the disposal and decision
making to take Enright’s job and at the moment he doesn’t win as much of his
own ball as Ling did. But he is firmly the no. 1 tagger now and has shown some
good signs, and they say the best way to learn is to follow the best players
around for a few years. I see him ending up somewhere around Andrew Carrazzo.
James
Hird's Excellence / Piss Ratio (JHEPR), greater in 2012 than 2000?
- J. Michael "The Love Train"
Howell, Jupiter FLA
I’m
surprised we haven’t yet had a plethora of “How Hirdy turned the Dons around”
articles. I mean, it’s gotta be coming, right? This weekend? Both papers? One
of those centerfold-of-sports-section type deals where they highlight a few
quotes and include the full colour photos? Or does everyone else just assume
like me that Bomber Thompson has his hand up his ass?
How
long will the Cats' form need to slump for before the usual suspects get the
nerve to trot out the "end of an era/I told you so" columns (again)?
- atilla
Start?
It hasn’t stopped for five years.
Cameron
Guthrie, do you like his poise and can you see a future for him as a slow-ish
but capable good decision maker down back, good overhead, a Milburn-esque type
without the brass knuckles?
- fustercluck
Woody
has shown some really good signs and has been one of the best of the under
50-gamers. His disposal is a little shaky at times but his poise and
decision-making (as you mentioned) are impressive for such an inexperienced
player. A couple of players come to mind when projecting forward; worst case
he’s a Steve Hocking career back pocket, best case he’s Joel Corey Junior and
realistically he’s probably somewhere in between, say… Brad Scholl? Which leads
us to our next question…
Who's
the best player out of the new breed at the moment? Any of them likely to be
200 game players?
- The B Man
The
above-mentioned Guthrie looks good, Smedts has had more wraps than pass the
parcel (sorry) and Allen Christensen is looking every bit of an AFL midfielder.
But my personal favourite is Mitch “Fletch” Duncan. He plays well in big games,
goes inside and outside, runs all day and looks like he wants to be great (as
much as it’s possible for me to gather a complicated read on his psyche). Most
of all, he kicks straight for goal and he wants to take the kick for goal.
Watch this clip of the third quarter of the 2011 Grand Final. In the middle of a two-point
game Duncan gets a handball from Bartel (after Stokes, was mauled and no free kick,
but I digress) and begins a run towards the 50m line. A senior teammate
(Varcoe) calls for the ball to his left. Fletch looks over his
shoulder, thinks, “Naaaah, I got this” and then drills a goal right down the
pipe from 50. Fkn Gold.
Who's
the most annoying player in the AFL? Any one of Ballantyne, Milne, Franklin,
Crowley, Tex Walker or is there someone else you'd like to belt more?
- The B Man
I’ll
let Mrs. Watson field this one.
“Mitch
Robinson was that undiagnosed ADHD kid at high school that no-one could bare,
never shut the fuck up, but somehow got invited to every party where he’d
creepily stand just outside each circle of friends and ruin every punch line.
He plays football now, but somehow gets fewer high fives and has still never
had (consensual) sex.”
What
you put the slump down to; senior players going through the motions a bit, too
many young players with no experience in the team, or both?
- The B Man
And
here it is; the $64 million dollar question. There are definitely some young
players getting games with an eye to future seasons rather than the 2012 finals
series. I can’t see Jesse Stringer “Bell”, for instance, playing a prominent
role in the flag defense, in 2014 perhaps, but not this year. Similarly, Billy
“Jimmy” Smedts, George “The Great Gatsby” Horlin-Smith, Steven Motlop, Mitch
Brown and Tom Gillies won’t be in the side should the Cats be lucky enough to
go deep into September again.
And,
as I alluded to a couple blogs back, that driving motivation to will oneself to
every contest at 100 miles an hour (which Essendon and Adelaide have at the
moment) might not be there for The Cats at this stage. It’s hard to stay
focused for so long when the business end of the season is so far away and one
views the home and away matches as merely qualifying.
Also,
they’re missing Ottens. West has been very good carrying the ruck by himself,
but the Cats looked a lot better with Stephenson there to help out. Orren
looked ok in his second game, and considering Geelong tinkered with and then
settled on two rucks last year, it’s obviously something they’re still thinking
about. Is Dawson Simpson the answer? I doubt it. Vardy would be handy, but
he’ll be on ice until next year. If Stephenson can stand up, it will make a big
difference.
The
big problem, and everyone knows it, is that they simply aren’t winning enough contested ball. This has never been a problem in the past, in fact, it’s been one of the greatest
things about this team, their ability to win the contested situations that can force
a team over the line (see, Grand Final, 2009). Does this automatically improve
as we get closer to finals? Is there some magic switch that the players (except
Joel Selwood) are waiting to flip? Let's hope so.